Worry not 😀- Lending Stream is here to help. Our short-term loan is designed to give you a quick financial boost, with the flexibility to repay in over 6 or 12 months. We have already helped over a million Brits with a fully-online instant-decision loan that can get to your bank account in seconds.
Its a short term loan product designed mainly to lend small sum of money to people with bad credit history, who find it hard to get it elsewhere quickly. It also is helpful for good/fair credit people when they need the cash urgently.
People refer to such loans as Payday Loans (an older term which isn't right in the current context), Short term loans and bad credit loans. These products are regulated by the Financial Conducts Authority (FCA) under High Cost Short Term Credit (HCSTC) category. These customers are majorly categorised by their credit worthiness and their bankability - near sub-prime and non-prime.
PMF achieved many years ago. Undergoing mature scaling now.
Leader in the market.
Solve urgent cash needs for UK residents by lending them smaller sum of money within the next few minutes (in most cases) by assessing their credit worthiness and affordability. The product is meant mainly for bad credit customers who don't get credit easily elsewhere. Secondary set of customers are people with good/fair credit but looking for urgent cash that they can pay back quickly. It's to be repaid back in 6/12 months through weekly/monthly instalments.
​
I've worked on this product, so I have access to data from primary and secondary research that I/my team conducted.
For Primary research - I and my team spoke to a few customers with different application attributes over audio calls/video calls. We also ran surveys to a set of users who're in the market to get short-term loans using third party providers.
The user research objectives and questions(not exactly what we asked but more or less same) are documented here.
​
I have focused on the most important target customers (not all) to ensure we focus on the the right audiences.
ICP Table
Criteria | User 1 | User 2 | User 3 | User 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Bad Credit borrowers - Young employed | Bad Credit borrowers - Older employed | Bad Credit borrowers - Self employed | Emergency borrowers |
% share of current customer base | 60% | 15% | 5% | 10% |
Age | 18-44 | 45-65 | 18+ | 18+ |
Monthly Income | £1000 - £3000 | £1000 - £2500 | £800 - £3000 | £1500 - £4000 |
Occupation | Full time/Part time employed A good share - NHS workers, and superstore employees (Tesco, Sainsbury, etc.) | Full time/Part time employed | Self employed | Full time/Part time employed |
Need | Quick - short term loan | Quick - short term loan | Quick - short term loan | Urgent cash |
Pain Point | bad credit history - limited options to borrow | bad credit history - limited options to borrow | bad credit history - limited options to borrow | Other loan options take time |
Brand loyalty | Low - go with cheaper option | Medium - go with cheaper option | Medium - go with cheaper option | Low - go with cheaper and quicker option |
Early adopters | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Spend time on | Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, OTT, Sports TV channels, Radio, Spotify | Cable TV, Radio, Facebook, YouTube | Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, OTT, Sports TV channels, Radio, Spotify | Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, OTT, Cable TV, Radio |
Perceived Value of Brand | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Frequency of use case | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Average loan size | Medium | High | Low | Medium |
​
We have multiple users of a product and not all of them can be our ICP for whom we make our strategies, we need to prioritize.
(ICP prioritization table)
Criteria | ICP 1 | ICP 2 | ICP 3 | ICP 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adoption Curve | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Appetite to Pay | Medium | High | High | High |
Frequency of Use Case | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Distribution Potential | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
TAM | High | Low | Low | Medium |
Based on the above table the prioritization preference for the ICPs would be ICP 1>ICP 4>ICP 2>ICP 3
So, we'd devise our strategy mainly based on ICP 1 and ICP 4. These 2 ICPs combined cover over 70% of our current customer base with a potential to strech ICP4 further.
A few interesting insights on our ICPs:
What they need in these situations is someone who can lend them money without social impact. They have a steady income that they can use to repay the loan back. It's for a shorter term, so interest rate isn't that big of a concern for a large share of users.
Business should focus on the core value-prop of lending to wider audience with quick disbursal. To be able to accept larger audience means higher credit risk which means, the interest rate needs to be high.
Keeping that in mind, the business should focus on delighting more users with their fast service catering to a large audience rather than worrying about a set of customers who find it very expensive. This is a need based product, so when in need, people would come even if it is expensive as there are limited solutions available for the problem.
​
An interesting thing about our competitors is that we're all competing for a common near sub-prime and non-prime audience with very similar product, placement, price and promotions.
For example:
​
​
​Now it’s time for some math, calculate the size of our market.
​
Market Size | Total Addressable Market (TAM) |
Total UK Adults | 50M |
HCSTC market share | 4% |
HCSTC Market | 2M |
Average Loans per person | 3 |
Total loans in a year | 6M |
Average loan size | £250 |
Total amount lent in a year | £1.5B |
Average Revenue per loan | £165 |
Total Revenue per year | £1B |
Now that we have calculated our TAM at £1.5B worth of HCSTC loan originations every year. Let's calculate our SAM and SOM.
SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market) = TAM x Target Market Segment (percentage of the total market)
As we don't currently serve a set of the market like users on state benefits or un-employed and a large part of self-employed users. Plus users with CCJ (County Courts of Justice) history, etc. We can only serve about 50% of this TAM.
So, our SAM = 50%*£1.5B = £750M
​
Now onto our SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market) = SAM x Market Penetration/Share
As the market is filled with direct competitors and alternative solutions. We also have restrictions in terms of how many loans can we give to our customers at a time, in a 6 month window and over a lifetime, which limits our market even further. We can realistically obtain only 25% of the SOM.
So, our SOM = 25%*£750M = £190M
​
We're currently at ~£85M loan amount originations every year which is about 45% of our SOM.
** Thing to note here is that although we're at £85M and have around £190M SOM - we cannot go about acquiring the rest of the market just like that. Given that we're a loan product, the big caveat here is customer quality which cannot be known for certain until a few months after customer acquisition. And we have had a chance to underwrite a lot of these un-acquired customers but decided not to acquire them as their CAC/CLTV was not making sense. Therefore, the growth beyond this point would be slow, which would be aided by more improved underwriting process, slight product enhancement alongside better retention and acquisition efforts.
​
* Another interesting thing to note is the presence of many lead brokers, who acquire all sorts of customers and then sell them to appropriate lenders to get a decent commission. This is at present the biggest and key acquisition channel for all of our competitors including us. But the problem with this channel is that these brokers (due to their effiicient business model where almost all their leads get sold at some price making PPC a viable channel for them VS lenders whose underwriting model doesn't approved more than 3-5% of the applications (click to application ~30%) leaving over 98% {100%-(30%*5%)} of the traffic useless. It becomes very difficult to bring enough revenue from the rest 1-2% trafffic to cover the entire PPC cost.
To combat this, I have created a new module within the product that sells the rejected leads to other lenders/brokers on a cost per funded lead basis just like other brokers do. This has given us some cushion to run some PPC campaigns but this needs to improve much more to get to a stage where this channel can scale.
​
The product is in Mature scaling stage - so need to focus on the existing best performing channles while testing some other channels to find new opportunities and avoid over-reliance on existing channels.
Channel Name | Cost | Flexibility | Effort | Speed | Scale | Budget |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organic | Low | Low | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Paid Ads | High | High | Low | High | Low (bcz it's very difficult to scale it while being profitable) | High |
Referral Program | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Partnership (brokers and affiliates) | Medium | Medium | Medium | High | High | High |
Content Loops | Medium | Low | High | Low | Low | Medium |
​
As we're in the mature scaling stage, we would continue to double down on Partnership and SEO while putting in some efforts on PPC and content loop. Partnerhip >> SEO >>> PPC >> Content Loops.
Under this channel, we work with different credit brokers and affiliates/price comparison websites targeting the same market to get qualified leads.
Credit brokers dominate our market for 2 key reasons -
Therefore, like all our competitors, we acquire most of our customers through them (over 80%). This is a cost efficient way to get leads that you assess as qualified.
The key differentiator becomes your unit economics that guide how much you can pay for different quality of leads, which decides how many leads you get to see and buy from the brokers vs your competitors in a bidding war.
The best way to optimize this channel is to improve the unit economics and underwriting model to better evaluate the leads and take better calls.
Affiliates/PCW - are partners who are not directly brokering the leads but in a way guide intent audience our way to get a commission. This is based mostly on the loan APR as the lowest APR products usually gets the top position. There are very limited affiliates who endorse high cost products like ours & very limited no. of users go to PCW to really compare products in our market, hence this channel is very small too.
Within Organic, the only 2 viable channels are SEO (Google/Bing search) and organic social media (Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok and YouTube).
We're currently doing well on SEO where we've grown our SEO clicks by almost 10X over the last 2 years and it can grow further which would take time. We're focusing on creating helpful content in the Cluster-Pillar format for all of our target keywords (long tailed too) alongside financial literacy content to establish ourselves as an authority within this niche.
The content created for SEO is repurposed alongside some more creative assets and testimonials to publish on social media. This helps with engagement but due to a very negative perception of the market as stated earlier and to not attract any more redressal claims, we push limited information-only content through social media.
That leaves making site optimized for SEO is the key priority within Organic channel - which we have done well and continue to focus on.
Segment the SEO roadmap into three key investments:
​
There was a time when I was spending over £600K per month on PPC to acquire customers profitably but due to market changes - the unit economic changed drastically pushing most lenders out of business and others working with a very low CAC. That made the PPC much more attractive acquisition channel for brokers who now had better margins than lenders.
Display and Paid Social Media marketing has also been a slightly expensive acquisition channel which got deferred further due to broader targeting (not as niche as PPC) which led to higher redressal cases.
For that reason, we have focused solely on Google PPC campaigns to capture new users under the paid marketing efforts which gets replicated to Bing search.
For PPC to become scalable for us, the internal broking model needs to improve with more participation from the direct lenders, which would take time. Until then, PPC would not make sense except for some very profitable KWs and branded terms.
Segment the keywords into three main themes:
​
There are 2 broad themes for the content loop cycle in our case:
Since social has not done much for earlier stated reasons, SEO with high quality content is the only viable channel here too.
Our loan is a very expensive way to borrow money in a super heavily regulated UK market. This is a product that you take in emergency situations (not medical one but any kind that requires money immediately). So we cannot advise people to take it for any purpose that is mainstream and channelized. However, some people do take it just due to convenience - something that we cannot promote/encourage.
Therefore, we cannot think of any product integration in this case.
As stated earlier, this is a product that people aren't happy/proud to use as it shows their financial vulnerability - so it becomes quite difficult for people to openly share it with their friends and family even if there are some monetary rewards. So it is a low scale and low value channel. I have tried that in the past but paused later when it didn't work out.
​
​
​
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth — from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore foundations by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Crack a new job or a promotion with the Career Centre
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patience—you’re about to be impressed.